What Is the North Carolina Age Verification Law?
In 2025, North Carolina passed a new age verification law aimed at restricting minors’ access to online adult content. The legislation was introduced by lawmakers concerned about the impact of digital platforms on children’s mental health and safety. Modeled in part after laws already in effect in states like Louisiana and Utah, the North Carolina law will take effect on January 1, 2026.
The law is part of a broader wave of state-level efforts to regulate age-gated content and ensure that businesses take active steps to verify the ages of their users before granting access.
What Does the Law Require for Age Verification?
North Carolina’s House Bill introduces strict obligations for online platforms and digital service providers to ensure that minors cannot easily access content deemed harmful. At the heart of the legislation is a requirement for businesses to implement a commercial age verification system that goes beyond simple self-certification.
Verification Methods
Websites must use commercially reasonable verification solutions that can confirm a user’s age with high reliability. Acceptable methods include:
- Government-issued identification checks, where users submit a driver’s license, passport, or similar official document.
- Third-party age and identity verification providers, which can cross-reference user information against authoritative databases without requiring companies themselves to store sensitive data.
By mandating these stronger methods, the law signals a move away from outdated “click-to-confirm” age gates, making age verification a serious compliance requirement rather than a formality.
Privacy Safeguards
While the law demands stronger verification, it also imposes strict privacy safeguards. Businesses may not retain private transactional data or sensitive identity information longer than is strictly necessary to verify age. This means companies must design their systems to protect children while minimizing risk to users’ personal information.
For many businesses, this will involve partnering with third-party vendors who can provide verification without exposing platforms to unnecessary data storage risks.
Accountability
Perhaps the most significant shift is accountability. Under the new framework, if a platform knowingly fails to verify a user’s age, it can be held liable for damages in court. This opens the door for parents or guardians to take action if their child accesses restricted content without proper safeguards.
This approach echoes what other states have done when they passed similar laws, but North Carolina goes further by clearly placing the legal responsibility on businesses rather than individuals.
The Bigger Picture
The law’s emphasis on robust verification and accountability reflects a national trend. Cases challenging these laws are already reaching the Supreme Court, and rulings could determine how far states can go in requiring businesses to implement age and identity verification tools. For now, North Carolina’s law is a strong statement of intent: platforms must protect children by ensuring access controls are real, enforceable, and privacy-conscious.
Who Needs to Comply with North Carolina’s Age Verification Law?
The law casts a wide net, making it clear that compliance is not limited to adult entertainment companies based in the state. Instead, the scope is deliberately broad, targeting any digital service providers whose platforms can be accessed in North Carolina.
Commercial Websites With Harmful Content
The most direct impact falls on commercial websites where more than one-third of the content is legally defined as “harmful to minors.” This includes sites hosting or distributing explicit adult content, pornography, or materials that would not be suitable for children under state law.
Online Publishers and Distributors
It also applies to online publishers and distributors of explicit materials, whether those businesses monetize through subscriptions, advertising, or other models. Even platforms that primarily act as intermediaries — for example, hosting user-generated content — must comply if they fall within the harmful content threshold.
Platforms Accessible in North Carolina
Perhaps the most consequential piece is jurisdictional reach. The law applies to any platform accessible in North Carolina, regardless of where the business is headquartered. That means a company based in California, Europe, or anywhere else must implement a commercial age verification system if North Carolina residents can use its service.
This extraterritorial element is what has sparked some of the most heated debates — and may ultimately be tested in the Supreme Court. Critics argue that requiring businesses nationwide (or even globally) to comply with state-specific laws creates a patchwork of obligations that digital companies cannot ignore.
Not Just Traditional Adult Sites
It’s worth noting that compliance could also extend to digital service providers outside the traditional adult industry if their platforms contain a significant portion of harmful-to-minors material. For example:
- Certain forums or video-sharing sites that allow explicit uploads.
- Subscription-based creator platforms.
- Smaller niche publishers hosting adult or explicit libraries.
Nationwide Implications
In practice, this means compliance is required not only for North Carolina-based businesses, but for any company with a digital footprint in the state. As more states have passed similar laws, businesses are increasingly forced to adopt uniform compliance strategies across all U.S. users — or risk violating one state’s rules.
By shifting the burden of responsibility to platforms rather than individuals, the law signals that protecting children online is now a mandatory duty for businesses, not an optional safeguard.
How North Carolina’s Law Compares to Other State Laws
North Carolina is not the first state to pass such a measure. Louisiana pioneered age verification for online adult content in 2023, and states like Utah, Arkansas, and Texas quickly followed. However, there are variations:
- Enforcement: Some states empower individuals to sue platforms directly, while others focus on regulatory enforcement.
- Scope: Certain states apply age verification laws specifically to pornographic sites, while others expand them to social media or other “potentially harmful” content.
- Challenges: Many laws have already faced legal challenges on grounds of free speech, privacy, and interstate commerce.
North Carolina’s law falls in line with the stricter end of the spectrum, requiring proactive compliance from businesses.
What Businesses Should Do to Stay Compliant
For businesses, the stakes are high. Non-compliance could lead to lawsuits, reputational damage, and financial penalties. To prepare:
- Implement a trusted verification system – Work with age verification providers who specialize in secure, privacy-conscious identity checks.
- Update privacy policies – Make sure your data handling practices clearly state how user information is collected, stored, and deleted.
- Audit your content – Determine whether your platform falls under the one-third threshold for harmful content.
- Train staff – Ensure your compliance, legal, and technical teams understand the requirements.
- Monitor legal developments – Court challenges could delay or reshape enforcement, but preparation is key.
Expert Perspective: What’s Next for Age Verification Laws in the U.S.?
Industry experts expect the trend of state-by-state legislation to continue, which could create a patchwork of rules for businesses operating nationwide. This fragmented approach is already raising concerns among legal analysts and compliance officers who see mounting complexity in navigating different state requirements. As Max Rieper, a legislative analyst at MultiState, noted, “a federal law would be somewhat more effective than a patchwork of state laws,” suggesting that a national standard could significantly reduce the compliance burden on digital service providers.
As more states adopt similar laws, there is increasing pressure for Congress to intervene and establish a consistent federal framework—one that protects children while also addressing critical issues of online privacy, First Amendment rights, and technological feasibility.